ArticleCureus2025
Impact of Cervical and Lumbar Spine Surgeries on National Football League (NFL) Player Performance and Return-to-Play Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAmerican football players face a higher risk of spine injuries due to the sport's high-impact nature, especially in the lumbar and cervical spine regions. These injuries may require surgical interventions aimed at allowing athletes to return to the sport. However, the effects of these surgeries on players' performance and career longevity have yet to be comprehensively studied.
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the impact of spine surgeries on National Football League (NFL) players' return-to-play rates and performance. We hypothesize that players undergoing lumbar surgeries would demonstrate greater performance improvement and return-to-play rates compared to those undergoing cervical surgeries, with differences influenced by player position and injury location. Study design and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study (III) for which NFL injury reports from 2005 to 2022 were reviewed to identify players who had undergone spine surgery. Data collected included player position, return-to-play, and years played following the procedure. Performance metrics were gathered using Super Bowl wins and Pro Football Focus (PFF) player performance ratings. Statistical analysis was conducted using Python version 3.10.12 (Python Software Foundation, Wilmington, DE, USA) to evaluate differences in return-to-play rates, performance changes, and career duration post-surgery.
resultsThe study identified 144 spine surgeries (77 lumbar, 67 cervical) among 136 players. Players who had lumbar surgery had a 61% return-to-play rate, with an average performance rating increase of 6.3%. In contrast, those who had cervical surgery had a 47% return-to-play rate and an average performance rating decrease of 5.8%. Lumbar surgeries were more common among linemen with higher BMIs, while cervical surgeries were more frequent in skill positions. Players with a history of lumbar surgeries were more likely to return to play than those without previous surgeries.
conclusionSpinal surgeries significantly impact the careers of NFL players. Lumbar surgeries show better outcomes in terms of return-to-play rates and performance improvements compared to cervical surgeries. The differences in surgical outcomes based on injury location and player position highlight the need for tailored rehabilitation protocols. This study provides valuable insights for medical practitioners, team management, and athletes, contributing to a broader understanding of the implications of spine surgeries in professional football.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.