Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642651›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Post-ESOphagectomy patients presenting for General Anesthesia INduction: A systematic review of the literature (PESO-GAIN-R).

Nika Samadzadeh Tabrizi, Alexander D Shapeton, Jamel Ortoleva, Michelle Burmistova, Riley A Demos, Sridhar R Musuku, Roman Schumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nika Samadzadeh TabriziDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Alexander D ShapetonDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Jamel OrtolevaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, Boston, MA, United States.
Michelle BurmistovaAlbany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States.
Riley A DemosBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Sridhar R MusukuDepartment of Anesthesia, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States.
Roman SchumannDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Immediately following esophagectomy, aspiration is responsible for most direct postoperative complications, largely attributed to anatomical alterations from the surgical procedure. The long-term risk of aspiration following successful esophagectomy has not been systematically investigated, and there are no guidelines for the anesthetic management of postesophagectomy patients who require elective surgeries involving general anesthesia (GA). Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception through January 1, 2024 to identify studies involving patients ≥90 days postesophagectomy and undergoing elective surgery unrelated to their esophagectomy status, where GA was required. Data on perioperative anesthetic management were extracted. The primary outcomes assessed were perioperative gastrointestinal and pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes included the approach to induction of GA and author recommendations. Results: Of the 4097 studies, ten studies involving 131 patients met inclusion criteria. Intraoperatively, adverse events during induction occurred in 13.0% of 131 cases, including regurgitation of gastric contents in 5.3% and pulmonary aspiration in 9.9%. The airway was managed with an endotracheal tube in 95.6%. Induction was performed in the semi-Fowler position in 92.9% and performed using the rapid sequence and standard induction techniques in 58.7% and 41.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Patients who have undergone esophagectomy may remain at high risk for aspiration during GA even in the long term, necessitating enhanced vigilance in anesthetic management. We offer evidence-informed suggestions for elective induction of GA in patients with a history of successful esophagectomy to enhance safe practice for these patients.

Indexed as

Airway managementanesthesia in esophagectomyaspiration on inductionesophagectomy

Identifiers

PMID40642651
PMCPMC12240513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.