Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642624›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Team-based learning versus traditional lectures in local anesthesia course: A cross-sectional study exploring dental students' perception and performance.

Salah Sakka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Salah SakkaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, KSA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Team-based learning (TBL) as a student-centered approach can be encouraged and supported by transforming the conventional lecture format into an engaging and active process of learning. The objective of this study was to explore students' perception of team-based learning and compare their performance after TBL sessions and traditional lectures in the local anesthesia course. Materials and Methods: Eight topics of local anesthesia during the academic years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 were divided into team-based learning sessions and traditional lectures. Teaching activities in TBL included tests and group discussions. A cross-sectional descriptive questionnaire comprising 10 written questions targeting students' perception of TBL and traditional lectures was handed to students at the end of the course. Results: The mean average scores of responses agreed with the related questions' statements. The results of Pearson's correlation test revealed that there was a significant relationship ( Conclusion: Students performed better and had positive opinions of TBL as their preferred learning technique when team-based learning substituted some didactic lectures.

Indexed as

Feedbacklearning outcomeslocal anesthesiateam-based learningtraditional lecture

Identifiers

PMID40642624
PMCPMC12240533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.