ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Awareness and practices regarding local anesthetic usage and toxicity among OB-GYN and anesthesiology professionals in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Local anesthetics (LAs) are commonly used in obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN); however, inappropriate administration can cause local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), a life-threatening condition. For safe medical practice, healthcare providers should carefully follow the guidelines for administering LAs for early identification and proper management of LAST when it occurs. Methods: This nationwide study used a 36-item self-administered questionnaire administered to healthcare professionals in OB-GYN and anesthesiology. The survey assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of commonly used LA agents, their appropriate dosage, and awareness of LAST's management. Results: A study of 391 Saudi healthcare professionals, between OB-GYN (51.2%) and anesthesiology (48.8%), reported greater engagement in anesthetic training and usage among anesthesiologists (88% trained, 58.1% daily use) than among OB-GYNs (38.5% trained, 30.5% daily use). OB-GYNs most commonly performed perineal tear repairs (88.5%), whereas anesthesiologists mainly performed paracervical blocks (89.5%). Lidocaine was the preferred local anesthetic for OB-GYNs at 93.5%, with anesthesiologists also favoring lidocaine but showing a higher use of bupivacaine (75.4%). Furthermore, the knowledge, attitudes, and practices scores of OB-GYN participants were significantly lower scores in all parameters compared to the anesthesiology participants ( Conclusions: Healthcare professionals in OB-GYN lack adequate knowledge of the safe and effective use of LA agents. Their knowledge must be increased through education to ensure safe practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.