ArticleHealth science reports2025
Recommended Hematocrit in Patients With Sepsis: An Observational Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Sepsis is a critical condition requiring optimized clinical management, especially in terms of hematocrit. The relationship between early stage of hematocrit and mortality in patients with sepsis remains underexplored. Method: This observational cohort study used data from the eICU Collaborative Research Database. Hematocrit within the first 72 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in patients with sepsis was analyzed. The association of hematocrit with hospital and ICU mortality was assessed using generalized additive models, and inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to ensure the balanced distributions of variables between the groups. Results: Our analysis revealed a pivotal hematocrit threshold of 33%. Below this value, the risks of all-cause hospital and ICU mortality significantly decreased. This nonlinear association underscores the importance of maintaining hematocrit above this value. Thus, hematocrit can serve as a critical marker for predicting clinical outcomes and improving patient management in the early phase of sepsis treatment. Conclusion: Early management of hematocrit is critical in patients with sepsis; maintaining hematocrit above 33% can improve survival outcomes among these patients. These findings suggest that anemia treatment strategies in sepsis care should be re-evaluated, and they demonstrate the importance of personalized management of hematocrit for enhancing patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.