ArticleHealth science reports2025
Primary Immunodeficiency Registry System: The Minimum Data Set Designing Phase-A Systematic Review and Quantitative Delphi Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrieval-Augmented Language Models for Clinical Decision Support in the Classification of Inborn Errors of Immunity.Journal of clinical immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Registries are powerful tools for data management. Designing a minimum data set as the first step in registry development helps collect relevant and efficient data. The aim of this study was to develop a minimum data set for the primary immunodeficiency registry system. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at two stages in 2023. In the first stage, primary data elements were extracted from related literature. In the second stage, based on the data elements extracted from the first stage, a questionnaire was developed. Then, using the questionnaire and the Quantitative Delphi Method, the minimal data set on primary immunodeficiency was obtained from 10 asthma and allergy specialists. Results: In the first stage, the initial minimum data set consisted of 198 data elements, which were categorized into two categories: administrative and clinical. Administrative data were classified into two categories: demographic and patient index. Clinical data were categorized into four categories: patient history, physical examination, tests, and diagnosis. In the second stage, eight elements were removed during the first round of Delphi. One element was removed in the second round of Delphi. In the first round of Delphi, 13 elements were recommended. In the second round of Delphi, all the recommended elements were included in the final list of the minimum data set. Finally, 202 data elements were selected as the final minimum data set. Conclusion: The created primary immunodeficiency minimum data set is expected to improve decision-making by clinicians and policymakers, and also improve scientific research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.