Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642543›Full record

ArticleCirculation reports2025

Improvement of Cardiovascular Prognostic Value of Endothelial Function Tests by Repeated Measurements.

Nobuyuki Masaki, Yuko Higashimura, Bonpei Takase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nobuyuki MasakiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, National Defense Medical College Saitama Japan.
Yuko HigashimuraDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, National Defense Medical College Saitama Japan.
Bonpei TakaseDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, National Defense Medical College Saitama Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The clinical significance of monitoring endothelial function in predicting cardiovascular events has not yet been fully explored. Methods and Results: Patients with diabetes or hypertension were enrolled in this study. Three flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and 2 EndoPAT reactive hyperemia index (RHI) were measured periodically in 3 years at 1.5-year intervals. Patients were followed up for 10 years after the examination period. In the FMD study, 136 patients were classified as those with consistently good endothelial function, as defined by FMD >7% on 3 occasions (n=33), and those without (n=103). In multivariate Cox analysis, patients who maintained high FMD had less thromboembolic major cardiovascular events or angina pectoris (n=24; hazard ratio [HR] 0.216; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.047-0.985; P=0.048). In the EndoPAT study, 120 patients were classified as those with consistently abnormal endothelial function, as defined by RHI <1.67 on 2 occasions (n=34), and those without (n=86). There were 9 all-cause deaths and 10 hospitalizations for heart failure. Patients with consistent RHI <1.67 had a higher mortality (HR 10.794; 95% CI 1.520-76.629; P=0.017) and incidence of heart failure (HR 5.356; 95% CI 1.301-22.052; P=0.020). Conclusions: Repeated measurements improved the predictive performance and revealed differences between FMD and EndoPAT RHI, which were better at predicting coronary events and heart failure, respectively.

Indexed as

Clinical studyEndothelial functionEndpoPATFlow-mediated dilationPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40642543
PMCPMC12240615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.