Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642532›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

A systematic quantification of hemodynamic differences persisting after aortic coarctation repair.

Christopher Jensen, Arash Ghorbannia, David Urick, G Chad Hughes, Amanda Randles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher JensenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Arash GhorbanniaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
David UrickDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
G Chad HughesDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Amanda RandlesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Aortic coarctation (CoA) comprises 6%-8% of all congenital heart diseases and is the second most common cardiovascular disease requiring neonatal surgical correction. However, patients remain at high risk for long-term complications, notably recoarctation. Methods: Hemodynamic simulations were performed in a group of six patients following CoA repair, as compared to a group of age and sex-matched healthy controls. Progressive narrowing at the CoA repair site was modeled to simulate the recoarctation process. Key measurements included time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) in the aortic arch and CoA repair site. Results: Repaired aortas demonstrated significantly higher TAWSS compared to healthy aortas in the aortic arch (3.46 vs 1.24 Pa, Discussion: The persistent high TAWSS in CoA-repaired aortas may underlie the poor long-term outcomes observed in this population. The identified nonlinear relationship between stenosis severity and TAWSS magnitude suggests a potential positive feedback mechanism, where abnormal shear stress exacerbates pathologic remodeling in the repaired aorta, highlighting the potential role of hemodynamic simulations in the clinical management of CoA patients.

Indexed as

aortic coarctationcomputational fluid dynamicslate aneurysmal degenerationlong-term complications of coarctationrestenosis

Identifiers

PMID40642532
PMCPMC12241028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.