ArticleCurrent research in food science2025
Bytes and bites: Consumer perceptions toward the power of artificial intelligence for foodborne risk mitigation through traceable food.
Article in Current research in food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated consumer attitudes and intentions toward adopting artificial intelligence (AI) in food traceability systems, an emerging technology aimed at enhancing food safety and transparency. Data collected from an online survey of 1013 United States consumers, the study applies structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the factors influencing consumer acceptance. Results showed that attitudes and perceived behavioral control are positively associated with decisions to accept AI-assisted food traceability, with trust in science, food safety concerns, fear of food technology, and risk information-seeking behavior also important factors. The model explained 80.2 % of the variance in intention and 18.0 % in attitude. Perceived behavioral control had a stronger impact on intention than attitude, suggesting that consumers who feel they have control over their food choices are more likely to support AI-enhanced traceability. Additionally, trust in scientific institutions emerged as a key predictor of acceptance, underscoring the importance of transparent and science-backed communication strategies. The study also highlights how concerns about foodborne illnesses and proactive risk information-seeking behaviors are positively associated with attitudes toward AI-assisted traceability. In contrast, food technology neophobia is negatively associated with acceptance, indicating the need for targeted educational campaigns to reduce skepticism. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, food industry stakeholders, and science communicators in designing effective strategies to enhance consumer confidence in AI-driven food safety initiatives. By addressing consumer concerns and fostering trust, AI-assisted traceability can be more successfully integrated into food systems, ultimately reducing foodborne illness risks and improving public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.