ArticleRSC advances2025
Formulation and evaluation of PVA-sucrose dissolving microneedles loaded with glimepiride nanocrystals as a potential transdermal delivery system.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delivery of liothyronine by microneedle patch for the treatment of hypothyroidism.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Biosensor-Integrated Microneedle Devices for Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic and Infectious Diseases: Current Status, Trends and Challenges.Biosensors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Considering the limited research on microneedles for potent transdermal oral hypoglycemic drugs, in this study, we formulated, glimepiride nanocrystals and incorporated them into PVA-based, sucrose-dissolving microneedles. Nanocrystals were formulated using two different aqueous surfactant solutions as antisolvents, PVP (at concentrations of 0.2% w/v or 2.5% w/v) and SLS (0.2% w/v), with or without a post-drying grinding step. Glimepiride nanocrystals using 0.2% w/v SLS with grinding showed the smallest particle size of 348 ± 27 nm with a PI of 0.29 ± 0.05, which was confirmed by SEM imaging. Therefore, the SLS-with-grinding formula was used for incorporation into a polymeric microneedle formulation composed of 23% w/w PVA and 15% w/w sucrose (GLIM_MN). GLIM_MN showed a microneedle height of 500 ± 14 μm and a sharp tip, as shown under SEM imaging. Furthermore, GLIM_MN could withstand a force of 32 N for 30 seconds at a rate of 0.5 mm per second. Moreover, GLIM_MN successfully penetrated three layers of Parafilm, which is analogous to the mechanical properties of the skin, and successfully penetrated excised BALB/c mice skin to a depth of 480 ± 15 μm, as shown by bright-field image microscopy. Moreover, GLIM_MN showed full penetration of the array into excised human skin to a depth of 276 ± 65 μm. Subsequently, we monitored the glucose level in healthy BALB/c mice for over 24 hours. The GLIM_MN treated group showed a rapid decline in the blood glucose level, reaching a minimum level at 5 hours. This was also corroborated with an increase in the level of serum insulin in the GLIM_MN treated group compared with that in the untreated group 5 hours after administration. Moreover, GLIM_MN-treated mice showed no significant change in the serum C-reactive protein level compared with that in the untreated group, indicating no inflammation upon microneedle administration. These results collectively indicate that our glimepiride dissolving microneedle formulation can enhance the delivery of glimepiride with minimal invasiveness, causing no inflammation. Therefore, it can be considered a potential treatment in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, avoiding the drawbacks associated with conventional oral administration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.