ArticleVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2025
Artificial intelligence system for EUS navigation and anatomical landmark recognition.
Article in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has been introduced in several medical fields with promising results, including endoscopy. In the field of EUS, studies using AI are still limited and have mostly focused on the identification and characterization of pancreatic masses. Recently, AI systems based on deep learning have been developed to identify anatomical landmarks during diagnostic EUS. Methods: The Endoangel system (Wuhan ENDOANGEL Medical Technology, Wuhan, China), built using deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs), is able to provide navigation hints and identify anatomical landmarks in real time during diagnostic EUS. The system was trained with more than 550 EUS procedures and uses a DCNN that processes images through multiple layers by extracting features, introducing nonlinearity, reducing complexity, and making predictions via fully connected layers. Results: The AI EUS system was tested in 3 patients undergoing diagnostic EUS. In each case, the correct recognition of anatomical landmarks by the AI EUS system was judged by a single expert performing the EUS examination. The system did not recognize pathologic alterations such as pancreatic masses or cystic lesions. Conclusions: The AI EUS DCNN-based system is able to correctly identify EUS anatomical landmarks. In the near future, this system might play an important role in EUS training and quality control. In addition, many other features might progressively be added, with the next ideal step being the identification of pathologic alterations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.