Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642402›Full record

ReviewVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2025

Coagulation forceps-sparing techniques for pre-emptive sealing of blood vessels during third-space endoscopy.

Zaheer Nabi, Pradev Inavolu, Rajesh Goud, Santhosh Darisetty, D Nageshwar Reddy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zaheer NabiAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Pradev InavoluAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Rajesh GoudAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Santhosh DarisettyAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
D Nageshwar ReddyAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Intraprocedural bleeding is a significant concern during third-space endoscopy, particularly in procedures like peroral endoscopic myotomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Although coagulation forceps can be used to effectively manage large blood vessels, their use necessitates frequent instrument exchanges, disrupting procedural flow and increasing costs. This review describes several distinct coagulation techniques to achieve coagulation without the need for hemostatic forceps. Methods: The following coagulation techniques were used: noncontact coagulation (SprayCoag E 5.5), saline immersion coagulation (SprayCoag E 5.5), contact coagulation with low-dose energy (PreciseSect E 0.9-1) or retracted tip of knife (SwiftCoag E 4), microwave coagulation using a bipolar device (10 W), and application of a novel self-assembling peptide (PuraStat). Results: All the techniques effectively coagulated the blood vessels, with a low incidence of breakthrough bleeding and need for adjunctive hemostatic techniques reported. The transition from air to saline lowers impedance, thereby reducing voltage, which in turn diminishes the dissection effect while enhancing coagulation efficiency. The dissection power of SprayCoag and other coagulation modes (SwiftCoag or PreciseSect) could be adjusted by increasing the target distance or reducing the energy dose, respectively. Use of a novel bipolar device enables coagulation using microwave energy and application of self-assembling peptide gel minimizes the need for an electrosurgical unit for coagulation. Conclusions: Several coagulation techniques effectively seal large blood vessels during submucosal dissection procedures, reducing reliance on hemostatic forceps. Further studies comparing these methods with conventional approaches are warranted to confirm their broader clinical applicability.

Identifiers

PMID40642402
PMCPMC12237755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.