ReviewVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2025
Coagulation forceps-sparing techniques for pre-emptive sealing of blood vessels during third-space endoscopy.
Review in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Intraprocedural bleeding is a significant concern during third-space endoscopy, particularly in procedures like peroral endoscopic myotomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Although coagulation forceps can be used to effectively manage large blood vessels, their use necessitates frequent instrument exchanges, disrupting procedural flow and increasing costs. This review describes several distinct coagulation techniques to achieve coagulation without the need for hemostatic forceps. Methods: The following coagulation techniques were used: noncontact coagulation (SprayCoag E 5.5), saline immersion coagulation (SprayCoag E 5.5), contact coagulation with low-dose energy (PreciseSect E 0.9-1) or retracted tip of knife (SwiftCoag E 4), microwave coagulation using a bipolar device (10 W), and application of a novel self-assembling peptide (PuraStat). Results: All the techniques effectively coagulated the blood vessels, with a low incidence of breakthrough bleeding and need for adjunctive hemostatic techniques reported. The transition from air to saline lowers impedance, thereby reducing voltage, which in turn diminishes the dissection effect while enhancing coagulation efficiency. The dissection power of SprayCoag and other coagulation modes (SwiftCoag or PreciseSect) could be adjusted by increasing the target distance or reducing the energy dose, respectively. Use of a novel bipolar device enables coagulation using microwave energy and application of self-assembling peptide gel minimizes the need for an electrosurgical unit for coagulation. Conclusions: Several coagulation techniques effectively seal large blood vessels during submucosal dissection procedures, reducing reliance on hemostatic forceps. Further studies comparing these methods with conventional approaches are warranted to confirm their broader clinical applicability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.