ArticleVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2025
Endoscopic truncal vagotomy. Exploring the fourth space. A technical feasibility study in a porcine model.
Article in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Surgical truncal vagotomy is an effective treatment for refractory hyperacidity syndromes but is associated with significant perioperative risk, high cost, and morbidity. Endoscopic truncal vagotomy and EUS-guided vagal modulation may offer a minimally invasive alternative. In our porcine study, we evaluated the technical feasibility of endoscopic truncal vagotomy and EUS-guided targeting of the vagus nerves. Methods: A Yorkshire pig weighing 170 lbs was used for the study under an institutional review board-approved protocol. EUS was first used to identify both the anterior and posterior vagus nerves. The nerves were tattooed using a fine-needle aspiration needle. A mucosotomy, submucosal tunnel, and full-thickness myotomy were used to access the periesophageal adventitia. A tunnel was then created in the esophageal adventitia (fourth space), and the vagus nerve was identified and transected. After transection, the mucosotomy was closed using hemostatic clips. The procedure was repeated for the anterior and posterior vagus nerves. Postprocedure necropsy confirmed accurate EUS-guided tattoo placement, complete nerve transection, and we evaluated for intraprocedural adverse events. Results: The procedure was technically successful, with stable intraoperative vitals noted. On necropsy, both the anterior and posterior vagus nerves were accurately tattooed and completely transected in the lower esophagus. No evidence of leaks, mediastinal injury, or adverse events was observed. Conclusions: This study demonstrates technical feasibility of (1) EUS-guided vagus nerve identification and targeting using a fine-needle aspiration as needed, and (2) endoscopic transection of both the anterior and posterior vagus nerves. Controlled dissection, low carbon dioxide insufflation, and meticulous technique are essential for safety. Further research is needed to refine the technique, assess safety and efficacy, and explore its full clinical potential.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.