Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642374›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of disability2024

Experiences of students with disabilities in technical vocational education and training colleges.

Precious Muzite, Velisiwe Gasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of disability, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Precious MuziteDepartment of Educational Foundations, College of Education, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5967-1250
Velisiwe GasaDepartment of Educational Foundations, College of Education, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3402-4268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in South Africa is often viewed as the 'Cinderella' of higher education, with many matriculating students choosing mainstream universities instead. This preference stems from stigma and misconceptions that label TVET students - often from poorer working-class backgrounds - as less intelligent than their university peers. The lived experiences of students with physical and learning disabilities in these institutions are particularly underexplored. Objectives: This study aimed to illuminate the experiences of students with disabilities at five TVET colleges in Gauteng, South Africa. Method: Using a phenomenological approach, the study conducted story exercises and individual interviews with a convenience sample of 40 students with disabilities. Results: The findings reveal that TVET education predominantly serves black students from marginalised backgrounds, with students with disabilities facing significant barriers in accessing both the curriculum and the physical environments of the colleges. Despite numerous challenges, a resilient narrative emerged among these students, rooted in African traditional values. Conclusion: This article contributes to knowledge on disability inclusion in higher education by showcasing the challenges and resilience of students with disabilities in South Africa's TVET system. Contribution: The study employed innovative methodologies, such as picture stories, to co-create knowledge with students living with disabilities.

Indexed as

decolonial theoryevidence-based actionevidence-based resources (EBRs)learning disabilitiesphysical disabilitiesstudents with disabilitiestechnical vocational education and training (TVET)

Identifiers

PMID40642374
PMCPMC12242078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.