Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642314›Full record

ArticlePhytoKeys2025

Further investigation of

Yu-Jin Chen, Mei Chen, Meng-Yuan Zhou, Zu-Chang Xu, Yu-Xiao Zhang, Jing-Xia Liu, De-Zhu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PhytoKeys, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Phylogeny ofPhytoKeys · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yu-Jin ChenGermplasm Bank of Wild Species & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crop Wild Relatives Omics, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3191-5078
Mei ChenGermplasm Bank of Wild Species & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crop Wild Relatives Omics, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0802-3669
Meng-Yuan ZhouGermplasm Bank of Wild Species & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crop Wild Relatives Omics, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1492-8494
Zu-Chang XuGermplasm Bank of Wild Species & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crop Wild Relatives Omics, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7431-1061
Yu-Xiao ZhangYunnan Academy of Biodiversity, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan 650224, China Southwest Forestry University Yunnan Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0602-3118
Jing-Xia LiuGermplasm Bank of Wild Species & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crop Wild Relatives Omics, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-6400
De-Zhu LiGermplasm Bank of Wild Species & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crop Wild Relatives Omics, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4990-724X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Cephalostachyumepitypegenome skimmingNeomicrocalamusnew combinationnew speciesnew synonyms

Identifiers

PMID40642314
PMCPMC12242230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.