ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025
Effects and mechanisms of resistance training on corticospinal adaptation.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Corticospinal effects and motor performance changes following resistance training in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Enhanced Brain Connectivity Following Six Weeks of Upper Extremity Offset Loading in Neurotypical Adults-A Preliminary Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cross-Segmental Transfer Effects of Lower Limb Cross-Training Priming on Upper Extremity Functional Recovery in Pediatric Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resistance training has a wide range of applications in sports, national fitness, and sports rehabilitation. In the early stages of resistance training, muscle volume did not show significant changes, but strength increased significantly, mainly due to adaptive changes in the human nervous system. This article focuses on exploring the effects and mechanisms of resistance training on the human corticospinal central nervous system, aiming to provide a theoretical reference for the scientific design of resistance training programs in various fields. Resistance training can enhance corticospinal excitability, lower the threshold for active movement, and increase the motor-evoked potential with increasing resistance training intensity. Resistance training significantly reduced short interval cortical inhibition and shortened the duration of cortical silence. After resistance training, the active muscle recruitment curve area significantly increased. Resistance training reduces the degree of coactivation between the agonist and antagonist muscles, reduces the cortical inhibitory effect of the active muscle, and increases the cortical promoting effect. The mechanisms of excitatory changes in the central nervous system during resistance training mainly include corticospinal adaptation, reticulospinal tract adaptation, and spinal cord adaptation. These mechanisms are mainly achieved through increased synaptic connectivity of cortical spinal motor neurons or increased excitability of motor neurons, or through increased synaptic efficacy of projections from the reticulospinal to the spinal cord. The mechanism of cortical inhibition reduction mainly be achieved by sensory feedback reducing the excitability of cortical inhibition circuits or accompanying activation of cortical facilitation networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.