ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025
Safety of magnesium orotate dihydrate as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 and bioavailability of magnesium from this source in the context of Directive 2002/46/EC.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety of magnesium orotate dihydrate as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 and bioavailability of magnesium from this source in the context of Directive 2002/46/EC.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the safety of magnesium orotate dihydrate as a novel food (NF) pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 and to address the bioavailability of magnesium from this source in the context of Directive 2002/46/EC. The NF is produced by chemical synthesis and is proposed to be used in food supplements at a maximum intake level of 6100 mg per day by adults. This intake level corresponds to around 5000 mg/day orotic acid and 400 mg/day magnesium. The Panel notes that this would exceed the established UL for supplemental magnesium of 250 mg/day, therefore the use of the NF could be nutritionally disadvantageous. The Panel also notes the previous safety assessment of magnesium orotate dihydrate, where concerns were raised regarding the exposure to orotic acid, based on several animal studies demonstrating tumour-promoting effects. The ANS Panel derived a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for orotic acid of 50 mg/kg bw per day. The margin between the derived NOAEL for orotic acid and the exposure resulting from the proposed maximum use level of the NF is 0.7 (based on the average bw of an adult person of 70 kg) which is even lower than the margin considered by the ANS Panel of being inadequate. The applicant has not provided any toxicological data on the NF or on orotic acid that could address or mitigate these safety concerns. The Panel concludes that the safety of the NF, magnesium orotate dihydrate, cannot be established under the proposed conditions of use. The assessment of bioavailability of magnesium from the NF in comparison to natural sources was not conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.