Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642259›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Secondary Rhinoplasty: Clinical Findings and Alternative Structures for Nasal Reconstruction in Latin American Patients.

Wilder A Perez Willis, Diana C Bazan Lazaro, Wilder A Perez Soto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Effect of donor-site rib stabilization on postoperative pain after autologous costal cartilage harvest in secondary rhinoplasty: a retrospective comparative study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wilder A Perez WillisFrom the Continental Clinic Private Practice, Lima, Peru.
Diana C Bazan LazaroPlastic Surgery, San Martin de Porres Private University, Lima, Peru.
Wilder A Perez SotoFrom the Continental Clinic Private Practice, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Revision rhinoplasty for patients with Latin American nasal characteristics presents a significant surgical challenge owing to complex anatomical and structural factors. A structured and systematic approach is essential for improving outcomes, and a statistical evaluation of the results and management techniques is needed to achieve optimal patient satisfaction. Methods: In total, 86 patients (69 women, 17 men; age range: 18-55 y) with nasal characteristics commonly associated with Latin American noses participated in this study. Each patient underwent secondary rhinoplasty using surgical techniques performed by the authors, which used costal cartilage structures for nasal reconstruction. Results: The most frequently observed clinical issues were excessive dorsal reduction in the upper third (37.2%), mid-vault deviation in the middle third (53.5%), and underprojection of the nasal tip (68.6%). Of the 5 structural categories used for reconstruction, type 1 was the most frequent (35.9%), whereas type 5 was the least frequent (1.3%). Conclusions: A successful revision rhinoplasty for patients with Latin American nasal characteristics requires an in-depth evaluation of each patient. The surgical methodology detailed in this work provides surgeons with the tools to address these complex cases effectively.

Identifiers

PMID40642259
PMCPMC12245248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.