Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642256›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Pilot Study: Investigating the Local Breast Microbiome in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using 16S rRNA Sequencing.

Laura L Barnes, Nisha Parmeshwar, Michael Campbell, Laura Esserman, Merisa Piper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura L BarnesFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Nisha ParmeshwarFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Michael CampbellDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Laura EssermanDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Merisa PiperFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prior studies have used 16S rRNA sequencing to examine and define the local breast microbiome, but this has not been investigated with respect to breast reconstruction. Periexpander fluid can be readily collected in patients with a dual-port tissue expander, which could allow us to define the local breast microbiome at any given time point. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of obtaining microbiome data from periexpander fluid and explore its potential relevance for clinical implant infections. Methods: We designed a pilot study including patients undergoing mastectomy with 2-stage implant-based reconstruction using dual-port tissue expanders. The periexpander fluid was obtained by accessing the aspiration port during standard postoperative visits, and this fluid was stored in a 1:1 ratio with DNA/RNA shield at -20°C. The microbiome of each sample was defined using 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing. Results: Intraoperative and postoperative samples from 10 patients were sequenced to determine the feasibility of obtaining microbiome data from the periexpander aspirates. We were successful in obtaining microbiome data from all aspirates. Our results indicate that there are a large range of genera represented, but several genera appear to be more pervasive, including Conclusions: We found that it is feasible to perform microbiome sequencing of breast tissue and periexpander aspirates to define the local breast environment. Rather than focusing on eliminating bacteria, it is critical to learn more about how we can optimize the balance of microorganisms in the breast microbiome to minimize infection risk.

Identifiers

PMID40642256
PMCPMC12245331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.