Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642250›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

A 5-year examination of CAPABLE implementation using RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks.

Deborah L Paone, Jeanne W Schuller, Matthew Lee Smith, Laura N Gitlin, Sarah L Szanton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deborah L PaonePaone & Associates, LLC, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jeanne W SchullerPaone & Associates, LLC, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Matthew Lee SmithSchool of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Laura N GitlinDrexel College of Nursing and Health Professions, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Sarah L SzantonJohns Hopkins School of Nursing and the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Examining the experience of organizations implementing evidence-based programs can help future programs address barriers to effective implementation, sustainment, and scaling. CAPABLE is an evidence-based 4-to-6-month program that improves daily function of older adults and modifies their home environments in modest ways to support their goal attainment. Through a guided process, utilizing an occupational therapist, nurse, and handy worker, the older adult sets goals and a personal action plan. In this study, we examined factors that advanced or impeded implementation and sustainability of CAPABLE. The researchers are embedded in the CAPABLE National Center and Johns Hopkins and provide ongoing technical support in implementation and dissemination of CAPABLE throughout the U.S., Canada, and other countries. Methods: We chose the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks based on their robust use in the U.S. for examining implementation of older adult health promotion and prevention programs. We examined the implementation and sustainment experience of 65 organizations adopting CAPABLE across 5 years (2019-2024). Data sources included licensure records, an annual survey, and additional notes collected Results: The following factors were consistently reported by these administrators as supporting ease of implementation: getting leadership support, accessing technical assistance, and maintaining fidelity to the program. Conversely, common challenges reported included difficulty with recruitment, hiring/finding the required personnel, and sustainability funding. Internal factors supporting readiness and adoption were perceived value of the program and program manager knowledge and commitment. External factors reported that supported adoption was initial funding to start a pilot, and alignment with "aging in community" strategic goals. Implication: This examination revealed positive and impeding forces for implementation and sustainment and identified where additional support was needed. Findings are guiding the development of this additional technical support by the CAPABLE National Center. In addition, efforts are underway to improve funding and policy to support CAPABLE to improve sustainment, scaling, and dissemination. This study also provides a use case for employing the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks together to track ongoing implementation. This helps address a gap in the literature concerning practical ways to monitor, evaluate, and report on ongoing implementation of evidence-based programs.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeHealth PromotionAgedCanadaHumansProgram EvaluationUnited StatesCAPABLECFIRevidence-basedimplementationimplementation effectivenessprogram fundingRE-AIMsustainability

Identifiers

PMID40642250
PMCPMC12243872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.