Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642242›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Administrative logic of grassroots community epidemic prevention from the perspective of attention allocation: evidence from Wuhan City.

Yanhua Zhang, Zuying Xu, Jiaxi Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanhua ZhangSchool of Public Policy & Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.
Zuying XuSchool of Economics and Management, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.
Jiaxi XuSchool of Political Science & Public Administration, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chinese grassroots governments utilize fewer administrative resources to carry out tasks assigned by higher levels of government. They have refined their attention allocation into two dimensions: intensity and span, and have developed different action models for routine and non-routine tasks. This management style is becoming increasingly common in Chinese grassroots government operations. Methods: This paper presented a multiple case study of policy practices in Wuhan City, Hubei Province. The study analyzed the attention allocation practices of China's grassroots government in high-pressure situations, particularly during the COVID-19 outbreak. Results: Grassroots governments can conserve attention resources by allocating attention efficiently and flexibly to deal with the dilemma of 'too many tasks with too little power'. We summarized three models of coping by grassroots governments: (1) Attention allocation model in routine tasks; (2) Attention model in non-routine tasks; and (3) Routinization model through attention diversion. Conclusion: This paper presented a framework for explaining grassroots government behavior from an attention allocation perspective. We also identified some limitations of this model, both as a complement to attention allocation research and for a better understanding of grassroots government behavior in China.

Indexed as

AttentionCOVID-19EpidemicsLocal GovernmentChinaHumansSARS-CoV-2attention allocationattention intensityattention spansemergency managementepidemic preventiongrassroots government

Identifiers

PMID40642242
PMCPMC12240977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.