Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642209›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025

Narcolepsy: a machine learning bibliometric analysis (1996-2024).

Minheng Zhang, Xiaodong Hu, Haiyan Wu, Haixia Fan

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Minheng ZhangFirst Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Xiaodong HuThe First People's Hospital of Jinzhong, Jinzhong, Shanxi, China.
Haiyan WuFirst Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Haixia FanThe First People's Hospital of Jinzhong, Jinzhong, Shanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Narcolepsy is a rare neurological cause of chronic sleepiness. This study aimed to better understand global narcolepsy through bibliometric analysis. Methods: Articles and reviews on narcolepsy were sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection. A bibliometric analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel, Python, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, R (bibliometrix), and the Online Analysis Platform of Literature Metrology to assess publication outputs, countries, institutions, authors, journals, co-cited references, and keywords. Results: The analysis included 5,215 publications, with citations significantly increasing from 1996 to 2024. The USA led in publications, while the top institutions were Stanford University, INSERM, and Université de Montpellier. Key authors like Professors Plazzi G, Mignot E, and Dauvilliers Y greatly contributed to the field through numerous publications and high citation rates. Sleep published the most articles, followed by Sleep Medicine. Keyword analysis indicated a shift toward molecular mechanisms, comorbidities, and diagnosis. Recent interest has surged in medications for excessive daytime sleepiness, such as "Pitolisant", "Modafinil" and "Sodium Oxybate" along with the relationship between narcolepsy and COVID-19. Conclusion: "Pitolisant," "Modafinil," and "Sodium Oxybate" have gained prominence in narcolepsy treatment. This study also highlights common comorbidities linked to narcolepsy, including "obstructive sleep apnea", "epilepsy" and "atrial fibrillation" driving researchers to explore these conditions to improve the quality of life for affected individuals. However, the interactions between key neurotransmitters in narcolepsy are still unclear, and challenges remain regarding factors that complicate drug therapy efficacy, necessitating further investigation.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysiscomorbiditiesmolecular mechanismsnarcolepsytreatment

Identifiers

PMID40642209
PMCPMC12241812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.