Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642199›Full record

ReviewPolish journal of radiology2025

X-ray velocimetry in dynamic imaging: a systematic overview of approaches.

Dani N Jijo, Omkar Uttam Gaonkar, Sayali Satish Chodankar, Adiel Bhandari, Farnaz Fiza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polish journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dani N JijoYenepoya School of Allied Health Sciences, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Mangalore, India.
Omkar Uttam GaonkarNitte (Deemed to be University), Nitte Institute of Allied Health Sciences (NIAHS), Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Mangalore, India.
Sayali Satish ChodankarNitte (Deemed to be University), Nitte Institute of Allied Health Sciences (NIAHS), Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Mangalore, India.
Adiel BhandariNitte (Deemed to be University), Nitte Institute of Allied Health Sciences (NIAHS), Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Mangalore, India.
Farnaz FizaNitte (Deemed to be University), Nitte Institute of Allied Health Sciences (NIAHS), Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Mangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray velocimetry (XV) is a novel imaging technique that allows for real-time viewing and dynamic analysis of air and blood flow. Traditional imaging techniques frequently cannot capture high-resolution, real-time flow patterns, which limits their diagnostic utility. This evaluation assesses the efficacy and dependability of XV compared to traditional imaging techniques. Our principal aim was to conduct a systematic review of studies that compare the accuracy of dynamic flow measurements of XV in comparison to existing imaging methods. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA criteria. Fourteen papers from indexed journals, including ScienceDirect and PubMed, were examined to determine the benefits of XV for capturing dynamic flow patterns. The data show that XV outperforms traditional imaging techniques by providing higher spatial and temporal resolution, allowing for exact tracking of airflow and blood flow dynamics. These enhanced visuals help to improve diagnosis accuracy and comprehension of physiological processes. XV is a significant improvement in medical imaging, providing real-time, high-resolution insights that help with patient evaluation and clinical decision-making. Its application may improve diagnostic capabilities and patient outcomes in pulmonary and vascular examinations.

Indexed as

airflow dynamicsdynamic imagingflow analysisfluid flow measurementtomographic techniquesX-ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID40642199
PMCPMC12243521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.