ArticlePolish journal of radiology2025
Detection of cholesteatoma recurrence by magnetic resonance imaging (DWI non-EPI sequence) - how can we minimise false results?
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Cholesteatoma Presenting as Persistent Otorrhea: A Case of Delayed Diagnosis Across Multiple ENT Specialists.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Limitations, Patient Characteristics, and Confounding Factors Impacting Neurotologic Lesion Imaging: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging Paradigms in Cholesteatoma: From a Traditional Approach to Personalized Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Comments on "Detection of cholesteatoma recurrence by magnetic resonance imaging (DWI non-EPI sequence) - how can we minimise false results?"Polish journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the diffusion weighted imaging without echo-planar imaging (DWI non-EPI) sequence in detecting cholesteatoma recurrence, focusing on the analysis of false results. Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted involving 156 patients diagnosed with cholesteatoma, who underwent reoperation between 2015 and 2021. All patients underwent preoperative MRI with the DWI non-EPI sequence. Data from surgical protocols, medical histories, outpatient records, and imaging results were analysed. MRI scans were reviewed by experienced radiologists and otosurgeons. The study was approved by the local Bioethics Committee. Results: Clinical and radiological concordance was found in 80% of patients. True positive results were observed in 77.5% of cases, while true negative results were noted in 2.5%. False positive results occurred in 8% of cases, mainly due to wax in the external auditory canal. False negative results were found in 12% of cases, often due to small or mural cholesteatomas. The sensitivity of MRI DWI non-EPI in detecting cholesteatoma was 87%. Conclusions: MRI DWI non-EPI is an effective tool for detecting cholesteatoma recurrence, potentially avoiding unnecessary second-look surgeries. Awareness of false positive and negative results is crucial, and correlation of MRI findings with clinical examinations is recommended. To minimise false results, ear cleaning before MRI and repeated examinations at intervals are advised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.