ReviewPolish journal of radiology2025
Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in liver biopsy.
Review in Polish journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver biopsy. The popularisation of imaging techniques that visualise the abdominal cavity, especially ultrasonography (USG), has resulted in an increase in the detection of focal liver lesions (FLL). If the results of other imaging modalities (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or computed tomography [CT]) are inconclusive, percutaneous liver biopsy should be considered. Taking into account the limitations of using MRI and CT in liver biopsy, this procedure is mostly performed with ultrasound. It is economical, safe, and swift. Whenever it is impossible to visualise lesions in B-mode (a condition necessary for a safe and effective biopsy), it is advisable to use advanced ultrasound techniques - CEUS or fusion imaging. Limitations of fusion imaging include prolonged time of data processing and difficulties in achieving optimal overlap of images. Conversely, CEUS enhances lesion visualisation but is devoid of the mentioned limitations - it is rapid and requires no additional processing. Furthermore, considering the potential of CEUS in the visualisation of focal liver lesions and differentiation of necrotic areas, accompanied by the ability to detect neuroendocrine tumours or its metastasis, we strongly believe that biopsy procedures - especially core needle biopsies - with CEUS assistance are potent tools in contemporary diagnostics. In this paper we want to share the experience of our centre and review the available literature on performing liver biopsies under CEUS guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.