ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Tumour nuclear size heterogeneity as a biomarker for post-radiotherapy outcomes in gynecological malignancies.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Radiotherapy targets DNA in cancer cell nuclei. Radiation dose, however, is prescribed to a macroscopic target volume assuming uniform distribution, failing to consider microscopic variations in dose absorbed by individual nuclei. This study investigated a potential link between pre-treatment tumour nuclear size distributions and post-radiotherapy outcomes in gynecological squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Materials and Methods: Our multi-institutional cohort consisted of 191 non-metastatic gynecological SCC patients who had received radiotherapy with diagnostic whole slide images (WSIs) available. Tumour nuclear size distribution mean and standard deviation were extracted from WSIs using deep learning, and used to predict progression-free interval (PFI) and overall survival (OS) in multivariate Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) analysis adjusted for age and clinical stage. Results: Multivariate CoxPH analysis revealed that a larger nuclear size distribution mean results in more favorable outcomes for PFI (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.19 - 1.09, p = 0.084) and OS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.24 - 1.25, p = 0.16), and that a larger nuclear size standard deviation results in less favorable outcomes for PFI (HR = 7.52, 95% CI: 1.43 - 39.52, p = 0.023) and OS (HR = 4.67, 95% CI: 0.96 - 22.57, p = 0.063). The bootstrap-validated C-statistic was 0.56 for PFI and 0.57 for OS. Conclusion: Despite low accuracy, tumour nuclear size heterogeneity aided prognostication over standard clinical variables and was associated with outcomes following radiotherapy in gynecological SCC. This highlights the potential importance of personalized multiscale dosimetry and warrants further large-scale pan-cancer studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.