ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025
Prenatal Self-Evaluation Questionnaire in Peruvian Women: Analysis Through the Psychometric Network.
Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lederman designed the prenatal self-evaluation questionnaire, which is a widely used tool for evaluating the psychological well-being and health perception of women during pregnancy. However, its structure and reliability may vary according to the population and cultural context in which it is applied. In Peru, no exhaustive studies have been conducted to validate the psychometric properties of this questionnaire. Objective: Assess the psychometric properties of Lederman-designed prenatal self-evaluation questionnaire in a sample of Peruvian women using the network approach (BootEGA). Methods: An instrumental investigation was conducted involving 790 women whose ages ranged from 18 to 45 years ( Results: The results obtained revealed the presence of a network structure consisting of five dimensions. These dimensions showed stability levels (0.70) and optimal average loads (0.15), supporting the idea that Lederman designed the prenatal self-evaluation questionnaire be composed of five different dimensions. Furthermore, structural consistency showed that the questionnaire is accurate and stable, with estimates <0.99. Conclusion: Using the network method, the psychometric robustness of the Lederman-designed prenatal self-evaluation questionnaire was satisfactorily validated in the sample of Peruvian women. These findings reinforce the questionnaire's relevance as a reliable tool for assessing psychological well-being during pregnancy, providing valuable insights for maternal health professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.