ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Food neophobia: psychological dimensions of consumer perception and emotional sentiment in social media discourse.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Addressing global food security necessitates exploring future foods, yet their societal acceptance hinges critically on public perception an2d psychological barriers such as neophobia. This study delves into the psychological dimensions underlying consumer perception of future foods, investigating the intricate relationship between food neophobia and these perceptions, and mapping the prevailing emotional landscape surrounding novel food adoption. Employing a Social Media Analytics (SMA) framework to capture ecologically valid public discourse, we utilized social media text analysis, integrating topic modeling and sentiment analysis, to dissect online expressions concerning future foods. Our analysis reveals that public evaluations are predominantly positive (53.20%), while a substantial segment expresses negative sentiments (30.48%) and ambivalence (16.32%). Psychologically, we identified four salient perceptual dimensions - taste, appearance, culture, and technology - which differentially mediate food neophobia and elicit distinct emotional valences. Notably, appearance and cultural perceptions are associated with heightened neophobia and negative emotional responses, suggesting underlying psychological mechanisms of sensory and socio-cultural rejection. These findings offer critical psychological insights for future food producers and policymakers, highlighting the psychological determinants of public attitudes toward future foods and informing psychologically-informed strategies to enhance consumer acceptance and promote dietary innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.