ArticleJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2025
Role of Metacognitive Awareness and Academic Motivation in Medical Undergraduates' Academic Performance: An Observational Study.
Article in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metacognitive awareness and confidence as predictors of academic performance in pharmacy students: insights from grade predictions and structural equation modeling.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Cognitive control and metacognitive awareness: do they shape academic achievement in university students?Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medical students' performance is influenced by metacognitive awareness and regulation, alongside self-determination or motivation. Understanding these elements is crucial for creating a curriculum that enhances learning outcomes and academic achievement. This study aimed to assess metacognitive awareness and academic motivation among medical undergraduate (UG) students and to determine the association between metacognitive awareness, academic motivation, and academic performance. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out at a medical college on 140 medical undergraduate (UG) students. The data were collected using self-administered questionnaires using Metacognition Awareness Inventory (MAI) and Academic Motivation Scale (AMS). The scores obtained were compared with their academic performance. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 20.0. The chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and post-hoc Dunn's test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The participants included 54.3% males and 45.7% females (age 20.4±0.9 years). High performers scored significantly higher on total (43.14±8.2) and domain-wise MAI scores compared to average and low performers. Female students scored better in all metacognitive domains (40.4±8.0) and had higher motivation scores than males (42.9±10.35). Academic performance was significantly correlated with metacognition regulation subscale scores (r=0.293, p=0.001) and intrinsic motivation scores (r=0.284, p=0.002). Also, metacognition regulation was significantly correlated with intrinsic motivation scores (r=0.376, p=0.00001) as well as extrinsic motivation scores (r=0.223, p=0.01). Intrinsic motivation scores correlated significantly with academic performance, metacognition knowledge subscale scores (r=0.406, p=0.00001), regulation scores, and extrinsic motivation scores (r=0.695, p=0.00001). Conclusions: High performers demonstrate superior metacognitive awareness and intrinsic motivation, especially females. Significant correlations between metacognition, motivation, and academic performance stress the importance of integrating metacognitive regulation strategies into teaching methods to improve the outcomes and motivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.