ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2025
Primary care experiences of family caregivers using the same medical facility as their care recipient or a different facility.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary care experiences of family caregivers using the same medical facility as their care recipient or a different facility.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Family caregivers and care recipients do not always have the same usual source of care, which may create barriers to providing optimal care for caregivers. This study aimed to compare family caregivers' primary care experiences based on whether they used the same medical facility as their care recipient or a different facility. Methods: We used cross-sectional data from a survey conducted in Japan in 2020. Participants were family caregivers aged 40-74 years who cared for community-dwelling adults with chronic conditions. Caregivers' primary care experiences were assessed using the Japanese version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool Short Form (JPCAT-SF). Multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in JPCAT-SF scores between caregivers who used the same medical facility as their care recipient and those who used a different facility. Results: Of the 406 family caregivers analyzed, 216 (53.2%) used a different medical facility from their care recipient. After adjusting for possible confounders, JPCAT-SF total scores were significantly lower among family caregivers using a different facility compared with those using the same facility (adjusted mean difference -5.73, 95% confidence interval: -8.93 to -2.54). The JPCAT-SF subscale scores for longitudinality, comprehensiveness (services available), and community orientation were significantly lower in the different facility group than the same facility group. Conclusions: Family caregivers who used a different medical facility from their care recipient reported more negative primary care experiences than caregivers using the same facility. Greater efforts may be needed to provide patient-centered, family-oriented primary care for these caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.