Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642122›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Stress to stability: Sense of coherence as a buffer against pandemic-related psychological distress.

Anita Padmanabhanunni, Tyrone B Pretorius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anita PadmanabhanunniDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Community and Health Science, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7733-7486
Tyrone B PretoriusDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Community and Health Science, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6325-6623

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Identifying protective factors in mental health-related outcomes is crucial, offering insights into the vulnerabilities and strengths individuals harness against psychological distress. There has been limited focus on exploring complex mediation and moderation models, which can uncover the relationships between stressors, protective factors and wellbeing. Aim: This study investigated the interrelationship between perceived stress, sense of coherence (SOC), and psychological distress. Setting: South African university students ( Methods: Moderation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro to examine the role of SOC in moderating the relationship between perceived stress and psychological distress. Where moderation was not significant, mediation analysis was conducted. Results: Sense of coherence demonstrated multiple roles in mental health, exhibiting direct effects on indicators of psychological distress. Sense of coherence moderated the relationship between perceived stress and hopelessness. Under heightened stress conditions, individuals with low to medium SOC displayed more profound feelings of hopelessness compared to those with high SOC. Mediation analysis showed that SOC served as a bridge between perceived stress and both depression and anxiety. The identification of a potential SOC threshold offers a novel perspective on assessing risk levels, suggesting that individuals with low to moderate SOC are particularly vulnerable under high stress. Conclusion: The findings emphasise the need for targeted approaches to strengthen SOC as a resilience-enhancing factor. Contribution: The study advances theoretical discussions on stress-buffering models and offers guidance for mental health practitioners working in high-stress environments.

Indexed as

COVID-19hopelessnessmental healthsense of coherenceset-point theory

Identifiers

PMID40642122
PMCPMC12243670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.