ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Multiple intelligence profiles of physical education teacher candidates.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the multiple intelligence profiles of prospective physical education teachers and examines how these profiles vary by gender, high school type, and sport participation. A total of 102 fourth-year students (Mage = 21.45, SD = 1.88) enrolled in Physical Education and Sports Teaching Departments at universities in Kyrenia and Nicosia (Northern Cyprus) participated in the study. Data were collected via a validated self-report inventory based on Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. The findings revealed that verbal-linguistic intelligence had the highest average score, while bodily-kinesthetic intelligence ranked lowest. Although overall intelligence profiles were relatively balanced, significant differences were found in certain intelligence domains based on gender and school type. For example, males scored significantly higher in visual-spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, and naturalistic intelligences, while students from religious vocational high schools scored markedly higher in existential intelligence. These results highlight the relevance of tailoring teacher training programs to the dominant intelligence strengths of teacher candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.