Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40642034›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

A systematic literature review on analytical thinking development in mathematics education: trends across time and countries.

Mingda Wang, Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore, Roslinda Rosli

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingda WangFaculty of Education, The National University of Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Malaysia.
Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd MatoreResearch Centre of Education Leadership and Policy, Faculty of Education, The National University of Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Malaysia.
Roslinda RosliSTEM Enculturation Research Center, Faculty of Education, The National University of Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Analytical thinking, which involves deeply understanding and dissecting information, is crucial in today's data-rich society. In education, it develops students' ability to think deeply, deconstruct problems, and evaluate evidence to enhance academic performance and critical thinking skills. However, past research has not thoroughly examined the patterns of analytical thinking studies, particularly in terms of year and country classifications, which are essential for identifying research trends and gaps. Methods: Hence, this study aims to classify studies on analytical thinking by year and country using Systematic Literature Review, because this data is useful for understanding research trends. By using a methodology according to PRISMA, the research process was divided into four key stages: searching, screening, analyzing, and summarizing. A total of 21 relevant articles were carefully selected and analyzed in depth through targeted searches on main databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Results: The main findings reveal a clear trend of increasing research on analytical thinking in mathematics, with notable peaks in 2021, and Indonesia emerging as the leading contributor in this area. Discussion: This finding has important implications for shaping educational policies and curriculum development, particularly in countries aiming to foster analytical thinking skills in students. Future research should broaden the scope by incorporating more disciplines and diverse theoretical frameworks, enhancing the application and impact of analytical thinking across fields.

Indexed as

analytical thinkingcognitive processmathematics educationsystematic literature reviewteaching strategies

Identifiers

PMID40642034
PMCPMC12241059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.