ReviewBiomaterials translational2025
Surface modification of polyetheretherketone for boosted osseointegration: A review.
Review in Biomaterials translational, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI for bioactive materials: From material design to biological applications.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Coral-inspired immunoreprogramming scaffold reverses the "immune-freeze" microenvironment to promote bone regeneration in steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Bone research · 2026Article
- Effect of Argon Plasma and Sandblasting on Bond Strength of PEEK and PEKK to Resin Cement.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Dual-functional micro- to nano-CFR-PEEK: promoting Hippo-mediated osseointegration while inhibitingRegenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Strong living scaffolds for load-bearing musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of orthopaedic implants has experienced rapid growth in recent decades, evolving from a few obscure examples to become one of the most vibrant domains within regenerative medicine. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) stands out as a formidable competitor in this field due to its exceptional biocompatibility and appropriate mechanical strength. However, the clinical application of PEEK is limited by its inherent biological inertness. Therefore, numerous studies have focused on overcoming the bio-inert issue of PEEK using surface activation techniques. It is necessary to delve into the intricate effects of these modifications and their corresponding methods. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of contemporary research on surface modification for enhancing osseointegration of PEEK implants, categorising them into four parts based on their modification methods and techniques used: (1) physical treatment, (2) wet chemical methods, (3) combination of physical and chemical treatments, and (4) bioactive coating. Finally, we outline the challenges and unmet needs that must be addressed by future designs of PEEK surfaces. Overall, altering the surface morphology and/or surface group of PEEK to obtain a rough, porous, hydrophilic, and bioactive surface, or incorporating bioactive agents/coatings with bone-forming abilities onto the surface of PEEK has shown great potential for promoting osseointegration, which can serve as a solid foundation for subsequent clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.