Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641965›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Advancing named entity recognition in interprofessional collaboration and education.

Rui Zhang, Yifeng Shan, MengZhe Zhen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rui ZhangBusiness School, Shandong Xiehe University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yifeng ShanSchool of Basic Education, Ningbo University of Finance and Economics, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
MengZhe ZhenSchool of Digital Technology and Engineering, Ningbo University of Finance and Economics, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Named Entity Recognition (NER) plays a critical role in interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and education, providing a means to identify and classify domain-specific entities essential for efficient interdisciplinary communication and knowledge sharing. While traditional methods, such as rule-based systems and machine learning models, have achieved moderate success in various domains, they often struggle with the dynamic, context-sensitive nature of IPC scenarios. Existing approaches lack adaptability to evolving terminologies and insufficiently address the complex interaction dynamics inherent in multi-disciplinary frameworks. Methods: To address these limitations, we propose a Synergistic Collaboration Framework (SCF) integrated with an Adaptive Synergy Optimization Strategy (ASOS). SCF models IPC as a dynamic multi-agent system, where disciplines are represented as intelligent agents interacting within a weighted graph structure. Each agent contributes dynamically to the collaborative process, adapting its knowledge, skills, and resources to optimize global utility while minimizing conflicts and enhancing synergy. ASOS complements this by employing real-time feedback loops, conflict resolution algorithms, and resource reallocation strategies to iteratively refine contributions and interactions. Results: Experimental evaluations demonstrate significant improvements in entity recognition accuracy, conflict mitigation, and overall collaboration efficiency compared to baseline methods. Discussion: This study advances the theoretical and practical applications of NER in IPC, ensuring scalability and adaptability to complex, real-world scenarios.

Indexed as

adaptive frameworkdynamic multi-agent systemsinterprofessional collaborationnamed entity recognitionsynergy optimization

Identifiers

PMID40641965
PMCPMC12240937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.