Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641962›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

A risk prediction model for poor joint function recovery after ankle fracture surgery based on interpretable machine learning.

Congyang Li, Chenggang Wang, Jiru Zhang, Wenjun Zheng, Jing Shi, Li Li, Xuezhi Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Congyang Li *Department of Orthopaedics, Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an, China.
Chenggang Wang *Department of Orthopaedics, Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an, China.
Jiru ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an, China.
Wenjun ZhengWound Stoma Care Clinic, Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.
Jing ShiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an, China.
Li LiDepartment of Science and Education, Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an, China.
Xuezhi ShiNursing Department, Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Currently, there is no individualized prediction model for joint function recovery after ankle fracture surgery. This study aims to develop a prediction model for poor recovery following ankle fracture surgery using various machine learning algorithms to facilitate early identification of high-risk patients. Methods: A total of 750 patients who underwent ankle fracture surgery at Lu'an Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University between January 2018 and December 2023 were followed up. The collected data were chronologically divided into a training set (599 cases) and a test set (151 cases). Feature variables were selected using the Boruta algorithm, and five machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, support vector machine, and lasso-stacking) were employed to construct models. The performance of these models was compared on both the training and test sets to select the best-performing model. The decision basis of the optimal model was further analyzed using Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME). Results: In total, 12 characteristic variables were identified using the Boruta algorithm. Among the five machine learning models, random forest model: AUC (training set: 0.840, test set: 0.779), accuracy (training set: 0.781, test set: 0.742); SVM: AUC (training set: 0.809, test set: 0.768), accuracy (training set: 0.751, test set: 0.728); XGBoost: AUC (training set: 0.734, test set: 0.748), accuracy (training set: 0.668, test set: 0.722); logistic regression: AUC (training set: 0.672, test set: 0.691), accuracy (training set: 0.651, test set: 0.656); lasso-stacking model: AUC (training set: 0.877, test set: 0.791), accuracy (training set: 0.796, test set: 0.762). The PR curve and decision curve of the lasso-stacking model were better than those of other models. The lasso-stacking model had the best performance. SHAP analysis showed that functional exercise compliance, combined ligament injury, and open fracture accounted for the largest proportion of SHAP values and were the most important influencing factors. Conclusion: Through evaluation and comparison of the developed models, the lasso-stacking model demonstrated the best performance and is more suitable for predicting joint function recovery after ankle surgery. This model can be further validated externally and applied in clinical practice.

Indexed as

ankle fractureinterpretability analysismachine learningpoor functional recoveryprediction

Identifiers

PMID40641962
PMCPMC12241071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.