ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Navigating the complexities of teaching rounds: balancing educational and patient-centered objectives.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Teaching rounds are a fundamental component of medical education, offering essential clinical learning opportunities for students while ensuring high-quality care for patients. Despite their importance, the psychological and emotional experiences of participants-attending physicians, interns, and patients-during these rounds remain underexplored. This study addresses this gap by examining the impact of patient presence on the learning environment, focusing on three key themes: psychological comfort and anxiety, cognitive load management, and emotional engagement and detachment. Material and methods: A design-based research approach was employed, conducted in a surgical ward affiliated with a medical college. The study involved 40 participants, including attending physicians, interns, and patients. Data were collected through 40 in-depth interviews, with analysis focusing on the experiences and perspectives of all parties involved. Results: The findings reveal that transparency in communication is crucial for building trust but can also induce anxiety among both trainees and physicians due to the scrutiny of their actions. Managing cognitive load was identified as a significant challenge, particularly for interns who must balance learning with patient interaction. Emotional engagement is vital for effective patient care but must be carefully balanced with professional detachment to maintain clinical objectivity. Conclusion: This study contributes to the understanding of the complex dynamics in teaching rounds, emphasizing the need for strategies that balance educational goals with patient-centered care. The insights gained offer valuable guidance for enhancing the learning environment in medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.