ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
Battlefield Neck Injuries: Contemporary Insights From the Israeli National Trauma Registry.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A model to simulate human cardio-respiratory responses to airway obstruction.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Neck injuries in warfare are critical due to the concentration of vital structures within a relatively unprotected anatomical region. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the epidemiology, severity, and outcomes of neck injuries during Military operations under "Operation Swords of War," leveraging data from the Israeli National Trauma Registry. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected for casualties from October 7, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Injury characteristics, time to surgical exploration, and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 1815 trauma casualties were recorded, with 147 (8.1%) suffering from neck injuries. The majority of these injuries were due to penetrating trauma (89.8%), with a significant number leading to surgical exploration (45.0%). The study highlighted the extensive use of resources for managing these severe injuries, including operating rooms and intensive care units. Conclusion: The findings underscore the high prevalence and severity of neck injuries in military conflicts and the critical need for rapid assessment and intervention. Comparisons with previous conflicts suggest an improvement in survival rates due to enhanced medical response and triage efficiency. In conclusion, neck injuries remain a significant concern in combat settings, necessitating specialized trauma care and rapid intervention strategies. The results from this study provide vital insights that can help improve trauma care protocols and outcomes in future conflicts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.