ArticleRadiology case reports2025
PEComa with metastatic pulmonary embolism upon presentation: A case report.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary Hepatic Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors: From Diagnosis to Treatment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- PEComas: current concepts in diagnosis, molecular pathways, and emerging treatments.The oncologist · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms with an incidence of approximately 0.3 per million. They exhibit histological and immunohistochemical features that overlap with angiomyolipomas and clear cell tumors. PEComas predominantly affect women and are either classified as being linked to tuberous sclerosis or are classified as PEComas-Not Otherwise Specified which means that their origin is not linked to tuberous sclerosis. They often arise from the genitourinary tract. The malignant potential of these tumors is determined by factors such as size (>5 cm), mitotic activity, necrosis, and vascular invasion. Treatment involves resection and mTOR inhibitors. Standardized treatment protocols are lacking due to rarity of the pathology, so each occurrence is considered on a case-by-case basis. A 69-year-old woman with dyspnea underwent CT imaging, revealing a large renal mass, a liver lesion, lung nodules, enlarged hilar lymph nodes, and a pulmonary embolism. Subsequent FDG-PET-CT confirmed FDG-avid lesions, with uptake of the pulmonary emboli suggesting their malignant origin. A subsequent liver biopsy diagnosed a malignant PEComa. MRI demonstrated T2 hyperintensity, restricted diffusion and postcontrast enhancement. Treatment with Everolimus resulted in a partial response of all lesions on 3-month follow-up imaging. PEComas were first recognized by the World Health Organization in 2002 and often present with nonspecific symptoms. They may manifest with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. This case highlights metastatic pulmonary embolism as an initial presentation. PEComas pose diagnostic challenges due to their nonspecific imaging findings and varied presentations. This case underscores their potential for aggressive behavior and the role of mTOR inhibitors. Despite successful treatment, the prognosis remains variable, necessitating multidisciplinary management and long-term surveillance. Early biopsy and molecular profiling are critical for optimizing outcomes. With this case report, we hope to bring attention to the possibility of pulmonary emboli being of metastatic origin when found in the context of a pre-existent oncological disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.