Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641826›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2025

SEPLINE: Socioeconomic Position in Epidemiological Research-A National Guideline on Danish Registry Data.

Cathrine F Hjorth, Thora M Kjærulff, Mette K Thomsen, Deirdre Cronin-Fenton, Susanne O Dalton, Maja H Olsen, SEPLINE Group, SEPLINE Group includes:

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of income and educational level as risk factors for atypical femur fractures: A Nationwide Danish Case-Cohort Study with Blinded Radiographic Review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. The role of socioeconomic position in use of systemic anticancer therapy.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Social inequalities in cancer in Germany: a call to action.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Socioeconomic differences in labour market attachment after breast cancer: a population-based matched cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cathrine F HjorthDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-8531
Thora M KjærulffNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3314-6570
Mette K ThomsenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7308-3431
Deirdre Cronin-FentonDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9738-2284
Susanne O DaltonCancer Survivorship, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5485-2730
Maja H OlsenCancer Survivorship, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6027-5717
SEPLINE Group
SEPLINE Group includes:

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic differences in health have become an increasing public health concern and priority, leading to a growing number of studies investigating the relationship between socioeconomic position and health outcomes. However, variability in methodological practices hampers the comparability of findings and leads to inefficiencies, as researchers invest substantial resources in selecting appropriate variables and methods. To address these challenges, the SEPLINE initiative was established to develop a methodological guideline aimed at enhancing the comparability, quality, and feasibility of socioeconomic research using Danish registry data. Methods: The guideline was developed through a consensus-driven approach involving an interdisciplinary group of stakeholders from Danish universities, research institutions, and data warehouses. The guideline addresses socioeconomic position as an exposure based on data from Danish registries, with the cancer continuum applied as a case outcome to illustrate its application. The development process included two collaborative workshops informed by a pre-workshop questionnaire. Workshop I (spring 2024) focused on socioeconomic indicators, data collection, and data management, featuring expert presentations and group discussions. Workshop II (fall 2024) addressed analytical methods, including causal inference challenges and income/wealth assessment methods. Insights from these workshops were integrated into iterative refinements of the guideline. Conclusions and Implications: The guideline provides a structured framework for conducting socioeconomic epidemiological research using Danish registry data, offering specific information on data sources and recommendations about variable selection, measurement timing, and data handling. While tailored to Danish registry-based cancer research, the guideline's methodological principles have broader applicability to other diseases and international contexts. By emphasizing transparency, theoretical grounding, and methodological rigor, SEPLINE aims to advance the study of social determinants of health. Researchers are encouraged to use the guideline as a relevant starting point and adapt it to their specific study populations and research questions, ensuring its relevance across diverse settings.

Indexed as

disparityguidelinemethodologyregistry-based researchsocial determinants of healthsocial epidemiologysocioeconomic inequalitysocioeconomic position

Identifiers

PMID40641826
PMCPMC12242267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.