Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641822›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025

Optimizing 5-Aminosalicylic Acid Maintenance Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis from the Patient and Physician Perspective: A Cross-sectional Multicenter Study.

Takahiro Amano, Takeo Yoshihara, Tsutomu Nishida, Yuko Sakakibara, Takuya Yamada, Satoshi Hiyama, Yoko Murayama, Naoto Osugi, Hideharu Ogiyama, Koji Nagaike and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Selective Drug-Free Active Surveillance in Ulcerative Colitis: Biomarker-Guided, Patient-Centered Approach.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Takahiro AmanoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-7519
Takeo YoshiharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0131-9294
Tsutomu NishidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4037-9003
Yuko SakakibaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5712-5502
Takuya YamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6531-409X
Satoshi HiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2723-6455
Yoko MurayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Itami City Hospital, Itami, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8853-8176
Naoto OsugiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9410-0894
Hideharu OgiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ikeda Municipal Hospital, Ikeda, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0850-505X
Koji NagaikeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Suita Municipal Hospital, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-4947
Yuki ArimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0880-5339
Shoichiro KawaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7590-8636
Toshio YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Otemae Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3869-2195
Shinji KitamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sakai City Medical Center, Sakai, Japan.
Hiroyuki OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nishinomiya Municipal Central Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Satoshi EgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki Central Hospital, Itami, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7776-6470
Shuji IshiiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Higashiosaka City Medical Center, Higashiosaka, Japan.
Takashi KizuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4025-5197
Masato KomoriDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6994-9132
Yuri TsujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8650-1843
Akiko AsakuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0283-070X
Taku TashiroDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7801-8230
Mizuki TaniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6808-4736
Yuriko Otake-KasamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8822-9544
Ryotaro UemaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0936-4268
Yoshiki TsujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0468-7542
Takahiro InoueDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7710-1526
Shinichiro ShinzakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7051-618X
Hideki IijimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka International Medical & Science Center, Osaka Keisatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5423-3059
Yoshito HayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4168-3322
Tetsuo TakeharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5036-3457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are currently no standardized guidelines for optimizing 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) maintenance treatment, particularly in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who have achieved clinical remission (CR). Therefore, this study examined the perspectives of patients and physicians regarding 5-ASA dose reduction and medication adherence to optimize maintenance treatment. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2023 to May 2023 at 19 institutions and included patients with UC and physicians. The participants' perspectives were assessed using an anonymous questionnaire. Results: This study included 369 patients with UC (female, 43.1%; age, > 60 years, 29.3%; CR, 88.9%). Preference to reduce the 5-ASA dose and low medication adherence were observed in 46.1% and 16.0% of patients, respectively. Low medication adherence (odds ratio [OR]: 3.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67-7.03) was associated with the preference to reduce the 5-ASA dose. Multivariate analysis for factors associated with low medication adherence revealed age < 60 years (OR: 10.25, 95% CI: 3.58-29.38), no intractable disease subsidy (OR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.09-6.35), dosing frequency ≥ 2 times/day (OR: 9.04, 95% CI: 3.67-22.25), and preference to reduce the 5-ASA dose (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.16-5.70) as significant. Among 153 physicians, 62.7% had > 10 years of experience, and 51.0% regularly verified adherence, with experience being a significant factor (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.10-3.68). Conclusions: Factors influencing medication adherence with 5-ASA included patients' desire for dose reduction and physicians' lack of experience. Improving communication with patients and enhancing education for physicians could help optimize treatment with 5-ASA.

Indexed as

5-aminosalicylic acidmedication adherenceulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID40641822
PMCPMC12238942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.