Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641808›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2024

An Update on the Status of Direct Testing for

David C Alexander, Muhammad Morshed, Derek Stein, Jared Bullard, Keith MacKenzie, Raymond Sw Tsang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David C AlexanderCadham Provincial Laboratory, Diagnostic Services, Shared Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Muhammad MorshedBC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Derek SteinCadham Provincial Laboratory, Diagnostic Services, Shared Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Jared BullardCadham Provincial Laboratory, Diagnostic Services, Shared Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Keith MacKenzieRoy Romanow Provincial Laboratory, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Raymond Sw TsangSyphilis Diagnostic Unit, National Microbiology Laboratory Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In Canada, the recent resurgence of infectious syphilis and rising rates of congenital syphilis have renewed interest in direct detection methods for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. The Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network (CPHLN) has previously published a series of guidelines for the diagnosis of syphilis in Canada, including the use of direct tests. In the decade since those guidelines were published, laboratory practice has changed. Methods: This systematized review combined a literature search (MEDLINE) of methods for direct detection of Results: Direct testing methods have favourable performance characteristics for detection of early syphilis and congenital cases. Although no government licensed commercial nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for syphilis is available in Canada, laboratory-developed tests have been implemented in multiple Canadian jurisdictions. Clinical specimens with the highest yield of positive NAAT results for syphilis include genital ulcers, skin lesions, and oral swabs from primary and secondary syphilis patients. For investigation of congenital syphilis, nasopharyngeal, placenta, umbilical cord, blood, and skin lesions are specimens of choice for direct detection of Conclusions: This update on the status of direct testing highlights the importance of NAAT for the detection of

Indexed as

clinical diagnosticsdiagnosisdirect detectionPCRsyphilisTreponema pallidum

Identifiers

PMID40641808
PMCPMC12169435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.