ArticleJTCVS techniques2025
Current intraoperative mechanical circulatory support strategies for bilateral lung transplantation surgery.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To discuss technical strategies and considerations to facilitate intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) management during lung transplantation. Methods: We review our institutional approach to the management of intraoperative ECMO during bilateral lung transplantation. Our proposed algorithm summarizes technical considerations based on the mechanical circulatory support (MCS) platform encountered in the operating room. Results: For patients without preoperative ECMO, an assessment of indications and available configurations in anticipation of the need for intraoperative ECMO is required. Our initial MCS approach for isolated respiratory failure is venovenous (VV) ECMO. If patients have pulmonary hypertension or right ventricular dysfunction with acceptable vascular access, then peripheral venoarterial (VA) ECMO is attempted. However, we maintain a low threshold for conversion to central aortic cannulation with a modified Seldinger technique through a clamshell or bilateral anterior thoracotomy incision. For patients bridged to lung transplantation on VV ECMO or venopulmonary (VPa) ECMO, our initial approach is to reverse flow through existing venous cannulas when possible and provide outflow through central aortic cannulation. Finally, for patients bridged to lung transplantation on peripheral VA ECMO, conversion to a central VA ECMO platform is preferred in the setting of poor flow or central hypoxemia. Importantly, all patients at our institution requiring MCS during lung transplantation are supported on a modified circuit that allows for rapid conversion from VA ECMO to full cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) as needed. Conclusions: We propose a simple and technically feasible algorithm to facilitate the intraoperative conversion of VV, VPa, and VA ECMO patients to a modified central VA ECMO/CPB platform during bilateral lung transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.