ArticleJTCVS techniques2025
Warm aortic arch repair: A new approach.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Warm aortic arch repair: Redefining proximal aortic arch surgery.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We present a streamlined approach for aortic arch repair that does not require hypothermic circulatory arrest or axillary/femoral cutdown. Methods: The procedure setup comprised standard right radial/femoral arterial lines, near-infrared spectroscopy, sternotomy, and cardiopulmonary bypass with arch central cannulation. Under normothermia, antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) was administered through the innominate artery via punctured aortic root needle cannula (closed ACP) or balloon catheter (open ACP). Aortic arch clamping followed, with bilateral ACP employed in selected cases. From 2019 to 2024, a total of 153 patients, including 48 (30.4%) with Type A aortic dissection, underwent warm arch repair. Results: The majority of repairs involved hemiarch (n = 137 [89.5%]), with a smaller subset of patients with zone 1 (n = 5 [3.3%]) and zone 2 (n = 11 [7.2%]) arch repair. The volume of warm arch repair cases increased during the study period, with its establishment as the standard approach since 2023, regardless of aortic pathologies. Median ACP flow rates were 8.6 mL/kg/minute and 11.3 mL/kg/minute for unilateral and bilateral ACP, respectively, with a technical success rate of 99.4%. In-hospital mortality and disabling stroke were 2.0% and 1.3%, respectively. Since the launch of this approach and initial experience, 4 surgeons at our institution have adopted this technique and the clinical indications for this approach have evolved. Conclusions: Warm aortic arch repair without hypothermic circulatory arrest or axillary/femoral cutdown is demonstrated to be safe, feasible, and reproducible. It has emerged as a new and valid approach for various aortic pathologies requiring hemiarch and selected partial aortic arch repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.