ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2025
A salutogenic approach to early labor midwifery care in Denmark, Sweden, and Switzerland: A qualitative study.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potential benefits of applying the GebStart-tool for advising primiparous women during early labor: A comparative study.European journal of midwifery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEarly labor is critical in shaping birth experiences, and women seek midwifery care to manage challenges during this stage. A salutogenic attitude, focusing on positive experiences and health promotion, is needed instead of the current pathogenic maternity model. This study aimed to understand how midwives support women's positive early labor experience and to identify key elements contributing to salutogenic midwifery care practices during early labor.
methodsWe employed a qualitative study design, conducting nine focus group discussions (FGDs) with 39 women in Denmark, Sweden, and Switzerland. First, data were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach to capture codes. Second, a salutogenic best-fit framework guided the analysis, structuring the data into three domains: comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness. Within domains, sub-themes were identified to elucidate how midwifery care might contribute to positive early labor experiences.
resultsComprehensibility was achieved when women trusted midwives to provide accessible, high-quality care tailored to individual needs to help them comprehend the maternity system. Manageability was experienced when midwives guided women through the uncertainties of early labor and provided plans when needed. Meaningfulness was created through availability, accessibility, and emotional support. Continuity of care was an underlying foundation for a positive experience of all three domains.
conclusionsA salutogenic midwifery approach, centering on flexibility and individualization, was essential to women's positive experiences cross-nationally. Salutogenic midwifery care during early labor reduced anxiety and enhanced emotional resilience. Our findings underscore the importance of salutogenic midwifery care for women in early labor, which should be recognized and implemented in maternity care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.