ArticleSultan Qaboos University medical journal2025
Enhancing Mortality Data Accuracy:
Article in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Mortality data is essential for global health policy and sustainable development goals, yet errors in death notifications, often exceeding 50%, challenge its accuracy. This is largely due to the lack of formal training among physicians and medical coders in issuing death notifications. This study conducting a national educational intervention and aimed to assess the outcomes of the intervention. Methods: A 2-day workshop was held in Oman in June 2023 for physicians and medical coders, employing a pre- and post-assessment design. The training, developed by both international and national experts, covered aspects of mortality data quality, based on the International Form of Medical Certificate of Cause of Death and validated by the World Health Organization. The curriculum focused on correctly defining and sequencing the causes of death and identifying common certification errors. Results: A total of 39 individuals, including doctors (59%) and medical coders (41%), participated in the workshop. A comparison of pre- and post-workshop assessments revealed significant enhancements in understanding mortality data. The doctors generally outperformed the coders in these improvements. Participant feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with approximately 80% strongly agreeing on the clarity and relevance of the content, as well as the engaging nature of activities and exercises. Conclusions: The intervention significantly improved the quality of mortality data by enhancing the accuracy of death certifications. This success was achieved through a collaborative effort, highlighting the model's potential for future online modules to extend its reach. This study underscores the importance of structured training in enhancing the utility of mortality data, contributing to better health system evaluation and policy-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.