Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641676›Full record

ArticlePublic health ethics2025

Public Health as a Constitutional Principle.

Alvin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alvin ChenCenter for Political Thought, RCHSS, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4748-165X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health is commonly regarded as a branch of public policy. While few governments would dispute that public health should be a core responsibility of the state, in practice, it is frequently reduced to a branch of administration, in competition with other branches over annual budget distributions and policy priority. This paper advances the argument that the state should prioritize public health for one crucial reason: public health is a normative principle that constitutes the modern state. As a constitutional principle, it demands the state to promote and preserve public health. The paper examines first what makes public health a normative principle, and then examines why it is a normative principle that makes demands on the state. In so doing, the paper distinguishes public health as a constitutional principle from the constitutional right to health. The paper concludes with a reflection on the urgency to prioritize public health, not merely because of policy needs, but on the ground that it is a foundational normative principle of the modern state.

Identifiers

PMID40641676
PMCPMC12242155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.