ReviewActa stomatologica Croatica2025
A 10-Year Observational Study on Treatment Approaches in Pemphigus and Pemphigoid.
Review in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate epidemiological data on pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigoid, with special focus on characteristics, clinical manifestations, and treatment approaches. Materials and methods: This study includes patients who have been diagnosed with pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigoid at the Dermatology Service of the Santa Maria Local Health Unit between the years 2013 and 2022. The statistical software IBM SPSS® version 29, with Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used for proportions. Results: The total number of patients included in this study is 99 patients with pemphigus vulgaris (49 females, 50 males) and 227 with pemphigoid patients (108 females, 119 males). Patients who have been treated for pemphigus vulgaris, the most prescribed medicine were corticosteroids, followed by the second most prescribed, drugs which were immunosuppressants. Additionally rituximab was used in 21 patients. The interval of the disease was 304 days; with an interval of no symptom disease was 415 days for relapsed patients. Similarly, for pemphigoid, the primary treatment used was with corticosteroids, which were also used for the main treatment, in many cases it was combined with other medicines, such as: antihistamines, antibiotics, and immunosuppressants. The average cure time was 148 days, with 32.0% of patients claiming they experienced relapse. Conclusion: To conclude, we observed that corticosteroids, particularly prednisolone, remain still the most important pharmacological treatment for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigoid. However, rituximab is an effective pharmacological alternative for pemphigus, while the use of clobetasol propionate is increasing and becoming as one of the preferred treatments for pemphigoid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.