Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641586›Full record

ReviewActa stomatologica Croatica2025

A 10-Year Observational Study on Treatment Approaches in Pemphigus and Pemphigoid.

Cristiana Palmela Pereira, Rui Santos, Leonor Ferreira, Matilde Martins, Ana Rodrigues, Diana Augusto, Paulo Filipe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristiana Palmela PereiraFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9164-7189
Rui SantosHigher School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic of Leiria, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7371-363X
Leonor FerreiraFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-
Matilde MartinsFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-6198
Ana RodriguesFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3081-0875
Diana AugustoFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-
Paulo FilipeFaculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7337-6493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate epidemiological data on pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigoid, with special focus on characteristics, clinical manifestations, and treatment approaches. Materials and methods: This study includes patients who have been diagnosed with pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigoid at the Dermatology Service of the Santa Maria Local Health Unit between the years 2013 and 2022. The statistical software IBM SPSS® version 29, with Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used for proportions. Results: The total number of patients included in this study is 99 patients with pemphigus vulgaris (49 females, 50 males) and 227 with pemphigoid patients (108 females, 119 males). Patients who have been treated for pemphigus vulgaris, the most prescribed medicine were corticosteroids, followed by the second most prescribed, drugs which were immunosuppressants. Additionally rituximab was used in 21 patients. The interval of the disease was 304 days; with an interval of no symptom disease was 415 days for relapsed patients. Similarly, for pemphigoid, the primary treatment used was with corticosteroids, which were also used for the main treatment, in many cases it was combined with other medicines, such as: antihistamines, antibiotics, and immunosuppressants. The average cure time was 148 days, with 32.0% of patients claiming they experienced relapse. Conclusion: To conclude, we observed that corticosteroids, particularly prednisolone, remain still the most important pharmacological treatment for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigoid. However, rituximab is an effective pharmacological alternative for pemphigus, while the use of clobetasol propionate is increasing and becoming as one of the preferred treatments for pemphigoid.

Indexed as

Drug Therapy Author Keywords: Vesiculobullous diseasesMeSH Terms: Vesiculobullous Skin DiseasePemphigoidPemphigusPemphigus Vulgaris. Pharmacological Treatment

Identifiers

PMID40641586
PMCPMC12239650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.