Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641577›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative methods

Walking into their lives: Applying the go-along method to explore refugee health.

Sarah Yeo, John Ehiri, Priscilla Magrath, Angela Dawson, Kacey Ernst, Halimatou Alaofè

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative methods. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah YeoThe University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
John EhiriHealth Promotion Sciences Department, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Priscilla MagrathHealth Promotion Sciences Department, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Angela DawsonFaculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Kacey ErnstEpidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Halimatou AlaofèHealth Promotion Sciences Department, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Funding

Cancer Prevention and Control Health Disparities Training ProgramT32CA078447 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI ALBERTS, DAVID SAMUEL, HARRIS, ROBIN B · 2016 to 2020
$1.2M
T32 Cancer Prevention and Control Training Program Addressing Health DisparitiesT32CA272303 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Terry A Badger, Gloria D. Coronado · 2023 to 2026
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA078447NCI NIH HHS T32 CA272303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The go-along method is a way of interviewing people in situ. Combining participant observation and interviewing, the method capitalizes on the advantages of both approaches. This places study participants in context and allows researchers to elicit the interpretations, practices, and experiences of those participants within the contexts. Based on a refugee maternal health study that involved the go-along method in the United States, we reflect on the specific research questions that this approach can help answer, the advantages and limitations of employing this methodological approach and delineate the process of conducting the go-along. The go-along method has numerous benefits in studying refugee health. It can assist in identifying the needs and challenges of people with limited language skills or low educational levels, as well as providing a more nuanced understanding of life skills and language proficiency. It can aid in the observation of interactions between study participants and people around them and provide more detailed information based on spatial cues. It can assist researchers in observing how services are delivered on the ground. More importantly, it can facilitate researchers' vicarious experiences for those who may struggle in their lives. In doing so, it can facilitate contextualized understanding of refugee and their experiences. Although this method has several limitations, such as being more time-consuming and labor-intensive compared to traditional sit-down interviews and being susceptible to external conditions, the go-along method has significant potential for exploring the health of refugees.

Indexed as

docent interviewgo-along interviewgo-along methodimmigrant healthin situ methodmobile methodrefugee healthwalking interview

Identifiers

PMID40641577
PMCPMC12244025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.