ArticleInnovation in aging2025
Effects of Dual-Tasking on Stepping Strategy and Inter-Joint Coordination During Walking in Older Fallers and Non-Fallers.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effects of different types of dual-task gait training on lower-limb coordination during dual-task gait in patients with stroke: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Falls are a major public health concern among older adults, often leading to injuries, impaired mobility, and loss of independence. Dual-task walking, where a secondary task is performed while walking, simulates real-life challenges and is linked to fall risk. This study aimed to investigate how dual-tasking affects stepping strategies, inter-joint coordination, and coordination variability during walking in older adults with and without a history of falls. Research Design and Methods: Twenty community-dwelling older adults (10 fallers, 10 non-fallers), aged 65 and older, completed a 2-min walking test under three conditions: single-task (ST) walking, motoric dual-task (MDT) walking (holding a glass of water), and cognitive dual-task (CDT) walking (serial subtractions). Gait data were collected using inertial measurement units. Stepping strategies were quantified by the changes in cadence and stride length, while inter-joint coordination was analyzed using vector coding. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess task and group effects on variables. Results: Task-specific adaptations were observed: MDT prompted greater stride length adjustments, while CDT led to more balanced cadence and stride length adjustments ( Discussion and Implications: This study provided better understanding on the differences of stepping strategies and phase-specific coordination patterns between older adult fallers and non-fallers, particularly under dual-task walking conditions. The conservative motor control strategies in fallers suggest a prioritization of stability over adaptability, potentially increasing fall risk during complex walking tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.